LED Light Therapy: Science, Wellness and Skin Rejuvenation
Share
From glowing skin to a balanced mood and improved sleep, LED light therapy or photobiomodulation has become one of the most talked about wellness treatments today. It uses precise light wavelengths to gently activate the body’s own repair systems. But does it really work? Let’s look at what the research reveals.
Red & Near-Infrared Light (600–900 nm): Cellular Repair and Skin Renewal
Red and near-infrared (NIR) light stimulate the skin’s mitochondria, the cell’s “power plants”, increasing ATP production, reducing oxidative stress and triggering collagen synthesis (Avci et al., 2013).
Clinical trials show that consistent use of red LED light can:
-
Reduce fine lines and wrinkles.
-
Improve skin firmness and elasticity.
-
Enhance overall tone and texture.
In a randomised controlled trial, participants who used 630 nm red LED light twice weekly for 12 weeks showed measurable improvements in dermal density and wrinkle depth, with results lasting at least one month after therapy ended (Choi et al., 2023).
Pros:
Clinically proven to support collagen and tissue repair.
Non-invasive and pain-free.
Suitable for most skin types.
Cons:
Requires consistent use, visible results take weeks to months.
Device quality matters, low-power LEDs may be ineffective.
Eye protection is essential during treatment.
Typical Costs:
-
In clinic LED facials: AU $80 – $200 per session.
-
At home LED masks: AU $300 – $900 for medical-grade devices.
LED therapy isn’t only skin deep. Red and NIR wavelengths (810–880 nm) reach muscles, tendons, and joints improving circulation, reducing oxidative stress, and relieving pain (Chow et al., 2009; Huang et al., 2022).
How it helps:
-
Reduces chronic pain (arthritis, back pain, tendinopathy).
-
Speeds up recovery after workouts or injuries.
-
Enhances flexibility and range of motion.
A meta-analysis of 22 randomised controlled trials confirmed clinically significant pain reduction with red/NIR therapy in musculoskeletal conditions (Chow et al., 2009).
Best for: Muscle soreness, joint stiffness, post-surgical recovery.
Treatment time: 15–25 minutes.
Course: 1–2 sessions weekly until improvement.
LED light has shown remarkable potential to reactivate dormant hair follicles in both men and women with androgenetic alopecia.
Red and NIR light extend the hair-growth phase (anagen) and improve scalp circulation (Jimenez et al., 2021).
Benefits:
-
Increases hair density and thickness.
-
Safe to combine with topical or medical treatments.
-
Visible improvement within 3–6 months of regular use.
A systematic review confirmed significant increases in hair count and thickness using LED therapy compared with placebo (Jimenez et al., 2021).
Best for: Early-stage thinning and maintenance after PRP.
Devices: Clinical scalp caps or targeted panels (630–850 nm).
Blue Light (400–500 nm): Acne Control and Mood Regulation
Blue light penetrates superficially but has potent antibacterial effects on Cutibacterium acnes (formerly P. acnes), making it effective in treating acne (Gold et al., 2018).
Beyond the skin, blue light also influences the brain. It activates retinal photoreceptors linked to the circadian system and mood regulation. A neuroimaging study found that 30 minutes of blue light exposure increased connectivity between the amygdala and prefrontal cortex brain regions involved in emotion and motivation (Vandewalle et al., 2021).
However, blue light at night can suppress melatonin and disrupt sleep, so timing matters.
Pros:
Helps control acne and oil production.
May improve alertness and daytime mood.
Drug-free and safe when used appropriately.
Cons:
Mixed evidence for mood improvement, benefits appear modest (Schimanski et al., 2022).
Evening exposure may interfere with sleep cycles.
Prolonged, unfiltered exposure can irritate eyes.
Typical Costs:
-
Acne LED sessions: AU $100 – $150 per treatment.
-
At-home handhelds: AU $150 – $400.
Violet & Near-Infrared Light: The Emerging Frontier
Violet light (~ 405 nm) and deeper NIR wavelengths (~ 900 nm) are gaining attention for potential benefits in mood enhancement, neuroprotection, and recovery. Early trials using violet LED goggles showed mood improvements in participants with mild depression, with no reported side effects (Kato et al., 2024).
NIR light, on the other hand, penetrates deeper tissues, improving circulation and cellular metabolism making it popular for pain relief, muscle recovery, and scalp stimulation.
Are LED Studies Trustworthy?
One challenge in this field is commercial bias. Many LED studies are sponsored by device manufacturers. To avoid this, the research cited here comes from independent or peer-reviewed academic journals with declared conflicts of interest.
For example:
-
Choi et al. (2023) and Vandewalle et al. (2021) were unaffiliated with device manufacturers.
-
Meta-analyses like Schimanski et al. (2022) pool results from multiple sources to reduce single-study bias.
Overall, the consensus across independent studies is that LED light therapy is safe and modestly effective especially for skin rejuvenation and acne. Evidence for mood and sleep benefits is promising but still evolving.
Choosing the Right Device
When selecting an LED therapy device for home or clinic use:
-
Check Wavelengths: Red (630–660 nm) and NIR (800–850 nm) for skin; blue (~ 470 nm) for acne.
-
Look for Safety Certifications: FDA clearance or CE marking ensures safety testing.
-
Protect Your Eyes: Always use goggles for bright or blue light sessions.
-
Consistency is Key: Most studies used 2–3 sessions per week for 8–12 weeks.
References:
Avci, P., Gupta, A., Sadasivam, M., Vecchio, D., Pam, Z., Pam, N., & Hamblin, M. R. (2013). Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) in skin: Stimulating, healing, restoring. Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, 32(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.12788/j.sder.0023
Choi, S. Y., Lee, Y. J., & Park, K. Y. (2023). Efficacy of red LED therapy for skin rejuvenation: A randomized controlled clinical study. Lasers in Medical Science, 38(5), 1167–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03570-
Chow, R. T., Johnson, M. I., Lopes-Martins, R. A., & Bjordal, J. M. (2009). Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet, 374(9705), 1897–1908. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61522-
Gold, M. H., Andriessen, A., & Biron, J. A. (2018). Clinical efficacy of blue light in acne treatment: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, 11(10), 22–28.
Huang, Y., Chen, A. C.-H., Carroll, J. D., & Hamblin, M. R. (2022). Biphasic dose response in low-level light therapy for pain and tissue healing. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 40(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2021.001
Jimenez, J. J., Wikramanayake, T. C., Bergfeld, W., Hordinsky, M., Hickman, J. G., Hamblin, M. R., & Schachner, L. A. (2021). Efficacy and safety of low-level laser therapy for androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 53(7), 870–879.
Kato, T., Wada, Y., & Hiramatsu, K. (2024). Violet light exposure as a potential non-pharmacological treatment for mild depression: A pilot randomized trial. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1421476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.142147
Schimanski, L., Pape, M., & Winter, S. (2022). Blue-light therapy for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 303, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.04
Vandewalle, G., Maquet, P., & Dijk, D.-J. (2021). Light as a modulator of cognitive brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.005
-
Disclaimer:
The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. LED light therapy, including its effects on skin, mood, sleep, or hair growth, should not replace consultation with a qualified healthcare professional. Always speak with your doctor or a licensed practitioner before starting any new treatment or therapy. Individual results may vary.